There are three ways, and people usually choose by effort. It is worth looking wider.
Forwarding
Fast and honest: the source is visible. One decisive drawback — the label is clickable, and part of your readers leave for the source. For an aggregator that means working on someone else's growth.
Copying by hand
Full control: strip what you do not want, add your own, publish at the right time. The cost is time. Five posts a day is tens of minutes daily, and the schedule breaks on the first busy evening.
A second drawback is less obvious: copying by hand loses formatting and albums. Text arrives without links or bold, and an album has to be rebuilt.
Cloning
Software does the same thing every day without gaps. In exchange it needs setting up — filters, delay, formatting rules — and you take responsibility for what reaches the channel unread.
Choosing
- One or two posts a week — by hand. Automation costs more than the task.
- Several a day, stable topic — a cloner.
- The credit is the point — forward. Sometimes naming the author is the value.
What none of them gives
None makes a channel worth following. On what to add to borrowed material — making it your own.
How Neurogram does this
Everything above is manual work that runs into the number of hours in a day. Neurogram does it on your own accounts and without you: it collects channels and audiences, writes comments and replies with a language model, and keeps limits and quiet hours so the accounts survive. See pricing or look at your case.